« August 2005 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Building Defects
Building Services
Business
Capital Facilities
Construction Industry
Energy Use
Government Policies
Natural Disasters
Public Facilities
The Environment
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
Letters
Wednesday, 20 July 2005
Taking Hurricanes Seriously
Topic: Natural Disasters
THE EDITOR, Sir:

AS THE nation rejoices at the passing of another hurricane we should not forget the complacency of some people regarding hurricane precautions - whether in disregarding evacuation notices or simply carrying on with business as usual.

There seems to be a mis-conception that hurricanes less than Category 5 in magnitude are just nuisances and pose no threat; which is far from the truth. In fact, the category system is not only based on a hurricane's wind speed, but also the extent of damage consistent within a specific band of wind speeds. Possible damage to buildings is as follows:

CATEGORY 1: Well-built, light-weight buildings not secured to the ground are likely to be damaged.

CATEGORY 2: Major damage may occur to similar buildings. Damage to roofing material, windows and doors may occur on other buildings.

CATEGORY 3: Small buildings may be structurally damaged.

CATEGORY 4: Complete failure may occur to roofs of small buildings. Otherwise, extensive damage may occur to roofing material, windows and doors.

CATEGORY 5: Considerable damage may occur to roofs; severe damage to windows and doors; and small buildings may be overturned or blown away.

Of course, this does not include the associated effect of landslides, mudslides, flooding, storm surges, falling trees or other debris. So, the potential for destruction exists with every hurricane and should not be taken lightly. It is much better for us to err on the the side of caution and be safe, than be sorry for not doing so.

I am, etc.,

PAUL HAY

phcadmin@phcjamaica.com

Managing Partner

PAUL HAY Consultants

15a Cassia Park Road

Kingston 10


Posted by phcjam at 6:46 PM EDT
Updated: Tuesday, 15 March 2011 8:07 PM EDT
Monday, 28 June 2004
Concerning Energy Policy
Topic: Government Policies

28 June 2004 

THE EDITOR, Sir:

Having just read Dennie Quill's article 'Big Bucks at the Pumps', in the June 25, 2004 edition of The Gleaner, please allow me to comment on the 'comprehensive national policy' for the construction industry.

First, Jamaica has had an Energy Efficiency Building Code since 1995. To quote the foreword to this document: "It is the culmination of a joint effort of the Jamaica Bureau of Standards, the Ministry of Public Utilities, Mining and Energy and Jamaican Architects and Engineers to develop the building standards which are appropriate to our own climate as well as to our building designs and construction practices."

ISSUES

This document addresses such issues as walls, roofs, openings, lighting (including daylighting), electric power, etc. Second, our architects and engineers were invited to seminars on its use. Graduates of the Caribbean School of Architecture at the University of Technology have been trained in its use since it was published. Personnel within the Parish Councils have also received training. The only thing lacking is the will to implement it.

The code was originally intended for voluntary compliance and I am aware that the Government had intentions of making it compulsory (hence the training of the Parish Council personnel). But the policy at present is a mystery.

I am, etc.,

PAUL HAY

phcadmin@phcjamaica.com

Managing Partner

PAUL HAY Consultants

15a Cassia Park Road

Kingston 10


Posted by phcjam at 7:28 PM EDT
Updated: Tuesday, 15 March 2011 7:55 PM EDT

Newer | Latest | Older