« September 2019 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Building Defects
Building Services
Business
Capital Facilities
Construction Industry
Energy Use
Government Policies
Natural Disasters
Public Facilities
The Environment
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
Group One
PAUL HAY Capital Projects Home
PAUL HAY Capital Projects Blog - Notes
Digital Design, Jamaica - Blog
Group Two
Lycos Home
Lycos Search
Lycos News
Letters
Saturday, 16 March 2013
Wyndham Fire
Topic: Building Services

On Thursday 14 March 2013, I had to divert from my usual morning commute to work due to the fire at the Wyndham Kingston Hotel.  So said, I will now comment on your editorial titled: “Wyndham Should Warn Others” as published in your Saturday, 16 March 2013, edition.  Wyndham should warn of more than you mentioned.

                Firstly, I support your advise that “the tragedy should serve as a wake-up call for all of corporate Jamaica to ensure that their emergency/disaster plans are fine tuned and tested and ready for roll-out”. However, the difficulty of guests finding the assembly point is the only such occurrence of inadequacy reported of the emergency/disaster plan.  But, there were a number of failures of the building services: namely, poor lighting of the means of escape and smoke-filled stairwell.  From this perspective, the comments of the Director of Tourism Mr. John Lynch takes on new significance.  I doubt the comments were meant purely of aesthetic concerns.

                Emergency lighting and exit signs should have been fully functional in the means of escape, and the ventilation system should have pressurized the stairwell to blow smoke away from it.  The fact that the smoke even got into the stairwell is itself troubling from the stand point that the areas of extensive damage are not directly connected to the stairwell.  To fully comprehend the importance of smoke management, it should be understood that it is smoke, and not fire, that is the major cause of death during fires.  Otherwise, the lack of an automatic sprinkler system is not a concern under most cases where adequate provision has been made for manual means of extinguishing fires: such as fire extinguishers and wet-rise fire hoses.

                Finally, you also mentioned the malfunctioning of the hydraulic platform used by the Fire Department.  This made it even more difficult for the Fire Department to reach the area from which the smoke was emanating.  So, kudos is due to our fire service who worked under difficult conditions, failing mechanical systems, and personal injury to bring the fire under control.  They were still present on the site that evening as I returned from work.


Posted by phcjam at 6:50 PM EDT
Updated: Saturday, 30 March 2013 9:33 PM EDT
Wednesday, 31 October 2012
Singapore shows why doing business is harder here
Topic: Construction Industry

Dear Editor,      

         I read with interest your article in the Caribbean Report, of 24 October 2012, titled “ Doing Business just got harder: Jamaica slips two Spots in World Bank Rankings”.  It is clear, from the assessment, that regulatory reforms were instituted in the majority of economies to improve ease of doing business.  But, it might not be clear how much new technologies played a part in the best of the regulatory practices.  This in mind, I write to briefly explain how Singapore manages to lead the world: at least with regard to dealing with construction projects.   

As early as 1995, Singapore’s Ministry of National Development implemented a project called CORENET: which stands for Construction and Real Estate NETwork.  Its objective was to re-engineer processes in the construction industry to achieve faster turn-around times, as well as increased productivity and quality.  CORENET was implemented by the Singapore Building and Construction Authority in collaboration with other public and private organizations.  An I.T. infrastructure was developed to facilitate integration of processes in a building’s life cycle: such as Design, Procurement, Construction, and Maintenance.

         The current effort provides (1) information services to speed up business planning and decision making; (2) electronic building plan submission, checking and approval; as well as (3) IT standards for communication between involved parties.  The benefits involve provision of (a) one-stop convenience for private and public sectors alike; (b) one-stop submission of plans to multiple authorities from any location at any time; (c) online access to check submission status; and (d) single billboard for approving authorities to post submission status.

         While we argue how to approve submissions within 3-months, Singapore is doing it earlier.  But, this did not occur overnight.  It started with the political will to improve the system, then the allocation of resources and controls to achieve it.  It really depends on how important business is to the political directorate and whether it is willing to look beyond short-term fixes to a long-term overhaul for the ultimate good of Jamaica, and those doing business in it. 


Posted by phcjam at 2:47 PM EDT
Updated: Wednesday, 21 November 2012 4:54 PM EST
Tuesday, 25 September 2012
Construction Industry's Use of updated Codes and Standards
Topic: Construction Industry

                Thank you for your article titled “Pay Now or Pay Later”, published in the Sunday Observer dated 23 September 2012.  Loy Malcolm’s advocacy for updated codes and standards being used in the construction industry is well founded.  But as with so many other things in Jamaica, implementation is the real problem: not the inability to have them drafted or their lack of acceptance.

                I can attest to the need for these codes and standards.  While working in the Projects Unit of the Ministry of Health, we had to use British standards to rehabilitate our hospitals, because our specialist health-facility consultants were British and no local codes existed for this purpose.  Had the original U.S. consultants who drafted the hospital programme been used for this phase of works, we probably would have adopted their standards.  We also need codes to address “green”, or sustainable, buildings.

                The industry is generally in agreement with Ms. Malcolm.  Updating codes and standards has even been written into Jamaica’s Vision 2030 Sector Plan for the Construction Industry.  Building professionals will even give of their time and effort freely to achieve this end.  Again, I can attest to the commitment of professionals that voluntarily worked on the steering and working groups that drafted the local adaptation of the International Building Code [IBC] in 2006.

                The IBC gets updated regularly every three (3) years but, after six (6) years, the relevant legislation has still not been passed to enforce our code.  It is hoped there will be no further delay on this matter.  Jamaica’s construction industry is poised to return to pre-recession levels of activity in the medium term, and planning has already begun on buildings that will be designed in the short-term.  If we are really serious about codes and standards, the time to act is now.  If we really want Jamaica to progress, let us stop procrastinating on matters as serious as this.


Posted by phcjam at 11:48 AM EDT
Updated: Tuesday, 25 September 2012 12:18 PM EDT
Saturday, 24 March 2012
Roof Drainage Problems at Cornwall Court
Topic: Building Defects

THE EDITOR, Sir:

 

Please allow me to respond to the letter from “Frustrated homeowner, Cornwall Court”, entitled: “Faulty Houses Drown Residents In Problems”, published on Saturday, 24 March 2012.  First off,  It is my hope that the National Housing Trust [NHT] would have already responded satisfactorily to this letter.  Otherwise,  I believe the matter will only be resolved through the courts. 

 

I do not know the specifics of this case but assume that the housing scheme is relatively new; in which case, very little if any maintenance would have been required of the residents.  The fact that other residents have the same problem, at this early stage, indicates that the NHT did sell you defective houses, though most likely unknowingly.  This defect may be due to defective workmanship, on the part of the specialist roofing contractor;  poor supervision, on the part of the general contractor; poor contract administration or defective design, on the part of the architect.

 

Under typical building contracts, clients like the NHT will take-over buildings at a stage known as “practical completion”.  As the name suggests, the building may not be fully complete; but, is expected to be completed within six (6) months: during which time, the contractor is responsible for making good all defects and any other that may arise during such period, at their own expense.  In this instance, it is my belief that the “defects liability period”, as it is called, has already expired and the NHT cannot rectify the matter without some expense on their part, even through the courts, and is attempting to pass of the matter unto the homeowners as their “lack of maintenance”.

 

My advice to the homeowner would be to have an experienced contractor look at the roof to determine the precise cause of the leaks, in order to confirm that NHT is indeed responsible for the repairs.  I give lectures at the Caribbean School of Architecture on the subject of Rainwater Drainage, and you are welcome to peruse notes given to the architecture students online at http://bit.ly/GWBdUB .  This might be particularly helpful if it is a design fault.  If it is confirmed that NHT is responsible, the contractor should estimate the cost of rectifying the defect, or defects; and, NHT should again be approached on the matter.

 

Failing any satisfactory outcome, all affected homeowners should collectively seek legal advice.  Due to the prospect of lengthy  court proceedings, homeowners might have to effect repairs at their own expense, and seek compensation through the courts.  But, this should only be undertaken on legal advice, which I am not capable of giving.  Again, it is my hope that the matter will be resolved without resorting to the courts, but ultimately that this defect will be rectified, irrespective of the path.

 

I am, etc.

 

 

Paul Hay MBA, BA(Arch.)
Managing Partner
PAUL HAY Capital Projects

Caribbean Capital Projects Management





P. O. Box 3367
Constant Springs, Kgn. 8
Jamaica, W.I.

tel: 1 (876) 756-0631
cel: 1 (876) 324-4274
fax: 1 (876) 756-0631

e-mail: paul.hay@phcjam.com
skype name: phcjam
twitter: www.twitter.com/phcjam
profile: http://www.linkedin.com/company/paul-hay-capital-projects
web: http://www.phcjam.com


Posted by phcjam at 3:10 PM EDT
Monday, 19 March 2012
Building Law
Topic: Government Policies

THE EDITOR, Sir:

In a letter to the editor published on July 14, 2010, entitled “Pass Building Law Now”, I made note of the long awaited enactment of legislation and national building-control framework.  To date, no progress has been made in this regard.

In your Editor's Forum, published on February 7, 2010, experts discussed lessons learnt from the Haitian earthquake six months earlier, and stated that "the failure of successive governments to pass legislation to introduce a national building code could put the lives of many Jamaicans at risk if the country gets hit by a major earthquake."  The editorial of February 10, even noted that "substantial work has (sic) already been done on a code for Jamaica.  It ought to be possible to complete the relevant law, in relatively short order, and have it passed by Parliament."  In an article titled 'New Building Codes Coming', on April 4, 2010, it was even stated that "Cabinet has (sic) issued instruction for the drafting of legislation to establish a national control framework for the island."  Yet, the completion of this law has now taken over two years, with no signs of completion in short order.  Are we waiting on the loss of lives before we act?

Having been involved in one of the several working groups charged with the review and adoption of the International Code Council's [ICC] 2003 edition of the International Building Code [IBC] late in 2004, I spoke of the dedication and effort made by local academics, architects, engineers and lawyers, who volunteered their time to complete that goal, and noted that the IBC was consistently revised by the ICC on a three-year cycle.  So, the code reviewed had been revised twice up to the date of the letter.  Parliament has now failed to pass the relevant law before the IBC 2003 has been revised a third time.

We now have a new administration in charge.  So, I restate my appeal for the enactment of legislation and national building-control framework.  Again, the longer Parliament takes to deal with this matter, the more outdated the work becomes, and the lives of more Jamaicans are put at risk.  Let us not wait for tragedy to hit before we act.  Let us be pro-active, for a chance.

I am, etc.

 

 Paul Hay MBA, BA(Arch.)

Managing Partner
PAUL HAY Capital Projects

Caribbean Capital Projects Management


P. O. Box 3367
Constant Springs, Kgn. 8
Jamaica, W.I.
 
tel: 1 (876) 756-0631
cel: 1 (876) 324-4274
fax: 1 (876) 756-0631
 
e-mail: paul.hay@phcjam.com
skype name: phcjam
twitter: www.twitter.com/phcjam
profile: http://www.linkedin.com/company/paul-hay-capital-projects
web: http://www.phcjam.com


Posted by phcjam at 5:26 PM EDT
Updated: Monday, 19 March 2012 5:45 PM EDT
Friday, 9 March 2012
Response to: A logical Approach to Economic and Social Development
Topic: Energy Use
Dear Editor, I would like to commend Dennis Chung on his contibution “A logical Approach to Economic and Social Development” in the Caribbean Business Report, dated Friday, 2 March 2012.  I support his observation that “the only realistic short-term project now is tax reform”: not public sector rationalization, nor pension reform.  We cannot afford to labour upon short-term initiatives any more.  Our comparative advantage and international productivity needs to be addressed  to deal with the trade deficit.  Towards this end, I concur that investments need to be made in capital infrastructure in areas of comparative advantage: notably tourism and agriculture.  Also, our food and oil imports need to be reduced.  But, this will not be an easy task, particularly with regard to reducing our dependence on oil imports. In this regard, I would also like to commend the University of the West Indies, and Professor A. Anthony Chen in particular, for hosting the Lecture Series “Climate-Energy Nexus: Call to Action”.  In the last lecture on 21 February 2012, Mr. William Saunders spoke on “The Energy Situation in Jamaica” where he gave an historical perspective of Jamaica’s worsening energy situation particularly as it relates to poor political decisions, or lack thereof.  Jamaica is a high consumer of oil, but before we blame it all on the politician we should be aware that on the demand side we have a problem with rising per capita consumption: which means we give too little regard to energy efficiency and conservation. Jamaica’s Energy policy 2006 – 2020 tells us that 36.6% of oil imports is used in Bauxite/Alumina processing, and 7.7% for aviation and shipping: both being export activities.  24.7% is used in the electricity sector and 23.5% in the transport sector.  So, only reduction of oil imports in these latter sectors would appreciably reduce our trade deficit.  In the transport sector, the Obama administration allowed older inefficient vehicles to be traded in at concessionary rates for new ones; but would this result in the desired 30 – 50% reduction of oil imports?  In the electricity sector, we now have net-metering, and Germany even paid rates in excess of that charged by utility companies to encourage production of solar energy; but, most of our energy demand occurs at night between 5:00 – 11:00 p.m. To our limitations of short-term and extreme thinking, let us add poor execution.  The Jamaica Energy Policy green paper was completed six years ago and we’ve had an energy-efficiency building code for seventeen years now.  How much has changed during this time?  Approximately, 60% of our electricity is consumed by commercial and industrial groups.  If we are truly concerned with dealing with our trade deficit, these groups have to be at the forefront of our effort.  I write not to discourage the forward-thinking among us but to forewarn that the task at hand will not be easily attained without hard work and dedication.  Are we up to the task?  Paul Hay MBA, BA(Arch.)
Managing Partner
PAUL HAY Capital Projects

Caribbean Capital Projects Management





P. O. Box 3367
Constant Springs, Kgn. 8
Jamaica, W.I.

tel: 1 (876) 756-0631
cel: 1 (876) 324-4274
fax: 1 (876) 756-0631

e-mail: paul.hay@phcjam.com
skype name: phcjam
twitter: www.twitter.com/phcjam
profile: http://www.linkedin.com/company/paul-hay-capital-projects
web: http://www.phcjam.com

  

Posted by phcjam at 5:07 PM EST
Tuesday, 4 October 2011
Competitiveness in the Jamaican Telecom Sector
Topic: Business
Dear Editor, I write with regard to Al Edwards’ article entitled “Answering LIME’s Factotums – Here and Elsewhere”, published in the Caribbean Business Report of September 30, 2011.  I have been following the debate about the Digicel/Claro deal and have also noted the two letters referred to: namely, “Don’t Tie the Competition’s Hands Behind Its Back” by Martin Bailey, and “Disingenuous Mr. Edwards” by David Headley.  However, I happen to subscribe to the views these letter-writers on the matter. In fact, I take exception to the tone of Mr. Edwards’ article.  Irrespective of whether he disagrees with their views or not, I would have expected a seasoned journalist to show more restraint and at the very least respect their right to hold an opposing view: just as I expect to respect his viewpoint.  Nevertheless, let me get “to the heart of the matter”. The matter at hand is to ensure competition exists between local telecoms, be they LIME, Claro, Digicel, or any other: the same competition that allowed Digicel to become the market leader.  As such, this organization of industry could be discussed without reference to any of the know competitors and the letter writers seen to be simply defending the status quo and being unwilling to see the gains eroded by allowing one telecom to achieve market dominance.  If we assume for the moment that “LIME has lost its competitive edge”, is this not reason in itself to ensure competition is maintained in the marketplace? It was also said that Claro “had to retreat due to its inability to permeate Digicel’s impenetrability”.  But, didn’t Digicel also retreat from Claro’s market?  When Claro took over Oceanic Digital’s MiPhone operation in Jamaica, it was rumoured that this was in response to Digicel’s entry into their primary market.  So, Claro’s primary goal would not have been to become market leader in Jamaica but rather to ensure Digicel could not expand in their primary market.  Who really achieved their objectives here?  If Jamaica did not have a third telecom, this scenario could not have been easily realized. The free market system cannot be left unregulated.  It is the duty of government to provide a framework which facilitates competition.  The approval of Digicel’s acquisition of Claro Jamaica was granted by the Prime Minister “in a statement to parliament on August 30, 2011” with conditions.  It is reasonable to assume that the condition of Digicel having to operate Claro Jamaica as a distinct operation was a save-guard to preserve competition.  So, Digicel cannot “rationalize its operations, unify and update its network”. Despite what we remember of Cable and Wireless Jamaica, before they became LIME, let us not forget that Cable and Wireless Jamaica was once called the Jamaica Telephone Company: an entity which had been nationalized by the government at the time and was later divested to LIME’s parent company Cable and Wireless: just as our ‘beloved’ Jamaica Public Service was also divested.  Even if it had been common knowledge at the time that Cable and Wireless would have been granted a guaranteed monopoly, no one would have cared.  We all thought what we were getting was superior to what we had.  Let us not make the same mistake again.  Let us maintain and improve what we have achieved to date and not erode it by allowing any telecom to achieve market dominance, especially by acquisition. Paul Hay MBA, BA(Arch.)Managing PartnerPAUL HAY Capital Projects Caribbean Capital Projects Management    P. O. Box 3367Constant Springs, Kgn. 8Jamaica, W.I. tel: 1 (876) 756-0631cel: 1 (876) 324-4274fax: 1 (876) 756-0631 e-mail: paul.hay@phcjam.comskype name: phcjamtwitter: www.twitter.com/phcjamprofile: http://www.linkedin.com/company/paul-hay-capital-projectsweb: http://www.phcjam.com 

Posted by phcjam at 4:29 PM EDT
Thursday, 12 May 2011
Energy Woe
Topic: Government Policies
THE EDITOR, Sir:                 In your editorial of Thursday 12 May 2011, you mentioned “energy was apparently not to be at the forefront of Mr. Golding’s strategic thinking during his budget presentation” and the general “lack of specificity, and only cursory mention of specific initiatives … that are critical to the creation of a competitive economy”. This failure to address the medium to long-term initiatives for the supply-side of the energy policy is indeed puzzling. But, neither was the short to medium-term initiatives for the demand-side mentioned: although it has otherwise been reported that the IDB has agreed to support the energy efficiency and conservation program within the public sector.                It may be recalled from my last letter, entitled “Great move on conservation” published on 2 May 2011, that I was concerned about the lack of specificity regarding the implementation of the program to reduce government’s energy bill by 15%: especially since government buildings are largely energy inefficient.  I was hoping my concerns would have been addressed by now. Instead, I have all the more reason to be worried. After reading my letter, a friend directed me to an IDB report entitled “Jamaica Energy Efficiency and Conservation Program”. This document outlines the issues, program objectives and coordination with Country Strategy/Programming objectives of the program. It even states, and I quote, “preliminary calculations  for the program confirms the potential for energy savings in the public sector of up to US$ 7million per year”. The problem is that this represents 6.7% of government’s energy consumption, not 15%.                Were the preliminary calculations way off the mark, or did the government simply disregard this assessment and stuck to their 15% target that was not achieved last financial year? I suspect the latter to be true. If so, there will be a deficit in the budget of at least US$ 8million on this item alone, which is the best case scenario if close to 7% savings is realized. But most likely it will not. The IDB document outlines three components of the program: (1) establishment of an executing unit to oversee the investment, (2) implementation of energy efficiency and conservation measures, and (3) demand-side management program and energy efficiency/conservation education. The former and latter components have been reported as being fulfilled, but what about the energy efficiency and conservation measures? The 7% energy savings will only be achieved after their implementation. Until such time, this degree of savings will not be achieved, which means the budget deficit can be expected to be approximately US$ 10million on this budget item alone.                Year after year we create budgets but fail to control our expenditure to achieve them. More than likely, our current budget is destined to such a fate. However in this instance, failure to control expenditure cannot be attributed to the implementing ministries and agencies but to poor planning and unrealistic expectations. It was hoped the government would lead by example in this matter of energy efficiency and conservation, but it appears this is not to be. When is this and subsequent administrations going to take the country’s energy security seriously. The country’s present and future competiveness is at stake. I am, etc. Paul Hay MBA, BA(Arch.)Managing PartnerPAUL HAY Capital Projects Caribbean Capital Projects Management    P. O. Box 3367, Kingston 8, Jamaica, W.I. tel: 1 (876) 756-0631 cel: 1 (876) 324-4274 fax: 1 (876) 756-0631 web: www.phcjam.com e-mail: paul.hay@phcjam.com skype name: phcjam profile: www.linkedin.com/in/phcjam twitter: www.twitter.com/phcjam

Posted by phcjam at 2:03 PM EDT
Updated: Monday, 16 May 2011 1:17 PM EDT
Monday, 2 May 2011
Great move on conservation
Topic: Government Policies
THE EDITOR, Sir: 

                With regard to your article entitled “Civil Servants trained in Energy Conservation”, published on Friday 29 April 2011, the Ministry of Energy and Mining is to be commended for taking this initiative, with support from the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). It is enlightening that those trained to be energy monitors are taken from various ministries, government departments and agencies to lead their respective organizations in implementing our government’s special policy of achieving energy efficiency and conservation.

                When I first read of government’s intention to drastically cut the public sector’s energy bill by 15% during the current financial year, I thought this, like the previous year’s directive, was doomed to failure because nothing had changed this time around. I stand corrected: a change has indeed been made. Not only has a specific goal and time-frame been set, but one that is measureable and now seems achievable. I am encouraged, but still worried that further resources that are required are yet to be allocated.

                Resources have been allocated in this planned process of organizational change, where staff has been trained to be supportive of the initiative; and it is obvious some form of energy management is to be implemented, though yet unannounced. But, a 15% reduction in energy use is ambitious, and made all the more so by having a building stock that is for the most part not designed for energy efficiency or conservation. We are told of contingencies to deal with energy costs, and the cutting of budgetary allocations set aside for utilities. But more is needed. I look forward to hearing about the remaining measures to be instituted. Because, this cannot be achieved without further resources being allocated. 

I am, etc.

 Paul Hay MBA, BA(Arch.)Managing PartnerPAUL HAY Capital Projects Caribbean Capital Projects Management  P. O. Box 3367, Kingston 8, Jamaica, W.I. tel: 1 (876) 756-0631 cel: 1 (876) 324-4274 fax: 1 (876) 756-0631 web: www.phcjam.com e-mail: paul.hay@phcjam.com skype name: phcjam profile: www.linkedin.com/in/phcjam twitter: www.twitter.com/phcjam

Posted by phcjam at 12:01 AM EDT
Updated: Monday, 16 May 2011 1:18 PM EDT
Friday, 29 April 2011
Big savings with more than one solar technology
Topic: Energy Use

Dear Editor,

                I am in agreement with Noel Mitchell’s letter entitled “Solar is the way to go”, which was printed in your paper, dated 27 April 2011. Jamaica should be utilizing much more solar energy than we presently do. But, utilization of photovoltaic (PV) panels (i.e. solar panels) is somewhat limited by their current inefficiency. Hence, large unshaded areas are required for their installation. Whenever a building exceeds three stories there is simply not enough roof space to accommodate all the panels needed to provide all of the buildings’ energy demand. So, individuals and small businesses most likely possess the required space to accommodate the panels, but initial costs may be unaffordable. Conversely “large buildings such as hotels, large office complexes”, some government ministries and hospitals will not have all the required space, though they may have the means to afford the installation. This is also the case with solar water heaters, and both are liabilities when hurricanes threaten.

However, an often overlooked yet effective solar technology is the use of daylight as a substitute for electric light. This is called “Daylighting”. You will realise that natural light was used to illuminate buildings before the advent of electricity. Today, it may simply entail the use of switches to control lighting fixtures adjacent to windows independent from areas deeper in a room: which will be darker. But, research has shown that occupants cannot be trusted to control these switches effectively; so, the current technology uses photocells to automatically dim or switch off electric lights as natural lighting levels increase. Again, space is an issue. Typically only spaces up to 4.5 or 6m in from windows can be “daylit”, though this can be increased by technology that is already in use at PCJ’s office building. Nevertheless, research again shows that daylighting will effect significant energy savings under these conditions, and especially in environments as our own.

So, it is possible to utilize solar energy for the greater part of our buildings’ energy demand. But, potential savings are even greater with use of more than one solar technology. Our government has proposing to use PV panels for street lights, which would be a worthwhile investment if and when it gets implemented. However, it may prove even more effective to provide incentives for the private sector to utilize more solar energy, while the government itself seeks to use more solar energy. Then, we could have a bright future, even when the price of oil is volatile.

 Paul Hay MBA, BA(Arch.)Managing PartnerPAUL HAY Capital Projects Caribbean Capital Projects Management P. O. Box 3367Kingston 8Jamaica, W.I. tel: 1 (876) 756-0631cel: 1 (876) 324-4274fax: 1 (876) 756-0631 web: www.phcjam.come-mail: paul.hay@phcjam.comskype name: phcjamprofile: www.linkedin.com/in/phcjamtwitter: www.twitter.com/phcjam 

Posted by phcjam at 12:01 AM EDT

Newer | Latest | Older